Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Romania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Romania
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Romania |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 10.8% | 16.3% |
| Range | 8.2% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Romania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |