South American Indian vs Kenyan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Kenyan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Kenyans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Kenyan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,202,963 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.72%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Kenyan |
| Minimum | 0.098% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 7.0% |
| Range | 16.2% | 5.6% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 3.2% |
| Median | 4.0% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Kenyans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |