Slavic vs Liberian Disability
COMPARE
Slavic
 Liberian
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Slavs
Liberians
12.4%
DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Liberian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,861,742 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,083,063 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Liberian | 
| Minimum | 3.5% | 4.8% | 
| Maximum | 70.6% | 26.0% | 
| Range | 67.1% | 21.2% | 
| Mean | 17.8% | 12.9% | 
| Median | 14.0% | 12.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 10.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 15.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 4.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 3.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 3.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Liberians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Canadian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Laos (12.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Scandinavian (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Dominica (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are British (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Slovenes | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Slavs | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Canadians | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Scandinavians | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.4% |