Slavic vs Swedish Disability
COMPARE
Slavic
 Swedish
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Slavs
Swedes
12.4%
DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Swedish Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,861,742 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 539,139,641 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Swedish | 
| Minimum | 3.5% | 3.3% | 
| Maximum | 70.6% | 77.8% | 
| Range | 67.1% | 74.5% | 
| Mean | 17.8% | 19.0% | 
| Median | 14.0% | 13.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 12.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 19.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 8.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 14.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 14.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Swedes by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Laos (12.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Slovene (12.4%, a difference of 0.30%), German Russian (12.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and Belgian (12.3%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and British (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Slovenes | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Slavs | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.4% |