Shoshone vs Celtic Female Disability
COMPARE
Shoshone
Celtic
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Shoshone
Celtics
13.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Celtic Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,617,208 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,857,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.47%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone | Celtic |
Minimum | 4.1% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 42.6% |
Range | 26.2% | 38.0% |
Mean | 15.3% | 16.5% |
Median | 14.1% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 18.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Celtics by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Tlingit-Haida (13.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Yemen (13.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Yakama (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), White/Caucasian (13.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Yaqui (13.2%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Marshallese (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), French (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Yakama (13.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Nepalese (13.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Slovak (13.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.1% |
English | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.1% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.1% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 13.2% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 13.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 13.2% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 13.3% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 13.3% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 13.3% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 13.4% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 13.4% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 13.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 13.4% |