Scottish vs Immigrants from Jordan Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Scottish
Immigrants from Jordan
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Scottish
Immigrants from Jordan
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Immigrants from Jordan Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,987,666 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,275,613 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.38%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 8.8% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 22.2% |
| Range | 47.9% | 13.4% |
| Mean | 18.2% | 15.9% |
| Median | 16.3% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Immigrants from Jordan by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Chile (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Vietnam (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Lebanese (17.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |