Pima vs South African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Pima
South African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Pima
South Africans
18.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs South African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,542,171 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,593,753 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 11.2%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | South African |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 30.2% | 19.8% |
| Range | 23.3% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 19.0% | 12.8% |
| Median | 18.4% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Pima by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Sudan (18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Yemen (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Kiowa (18.7%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |