Tlingit-Haida vs South African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
South African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
South Africans
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
59.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs South African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,402 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,593,753 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | South African |
Minimum | 5.0% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 23.4% | 19.8% |
Range | 18.4% | 17.3% |
Mean | 14.7% | 12.8% |
Median | 15.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 15.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Ecuadorian (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Syria (17.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |
Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |
Shoshone | 49.2 /100 | #176 | Average 17.3% |
Ute | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 17.3% |
Spanish | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |