Cuban vs Chippewa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Cuban
Chippewa
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Cubans
Chippewa
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Chippewa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,885,451 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,949,512 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.77% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 5.0% | 8.4% |
| Range | 4.2% | 7.6% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.80% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.79% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Chippewa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Celtic (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Scotch-Irish (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.5% |