Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
 Chippewa
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Chippewa
2.5%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chippewa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,877,901 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,949,512 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Chippewa | 
| Minimum | 0.38% | 0.77% | 
| Maximum | 5.1% | 8.4% | 
| Range | 4.7% | 7.6% | 
| Mean | 2.3% | 3.1% | 
| Median | 2.3% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.87% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.87% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Chippewa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Nonimmigrants (2.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Crow (2.5%, a difference of 0.49%), French American Indian (2.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and Honduran (2.5%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Scotch-Irish (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #286  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #288  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 2.5%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 2.5%  |