Immigrants from England vs British Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
British
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from England
British
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs British Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,842,020 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.950 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.62%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | British |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.87% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 73.1% | 99.1% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 13.1% |
| Median | 8.2% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and British by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |