Russian vs Latvian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Russian
Latvian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Russians
Latvians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Latvian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,148,193 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,626,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.22% | 0.25% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 7.5% |
| Range | 49.8% | 7.3% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Latvians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |