Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Latvian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Latvian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Latvians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Latvian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,413,823 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,626,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.25% |
| Maximum | 10.1% | 7.5% |
| Range | 9.6% | 7.3% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Latvians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Armenian (2.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |