Russian vs Latvian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Russian
Latvian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Russians
Latvians
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Latvian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,532,980 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,634,735 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.060%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian | Latvian |
Minimum | 0.73% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 33.4% |
Range | 49.3% | 31.8% |
Mean | 12.8% | 11.2% |
Median | 9.4% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Latvians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Brazil (10.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (10.2%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Brazil (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Sri Lankan (10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Jordanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 99.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Laotians | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |