Polish vs Immigrants from Oceania Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Polish
 Immigrants from Oceania
 Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from Oceania
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
88.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
28.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from Oceania Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,400,698 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,144,146 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 3.7%.
 
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from Oceania | 
| Minimum | 0.81% | 0.86% | 
| Maximum | 29.3% | 17.7% | 
| Range | 28.5% | 16.8% | 
| Mean | 3.4% | 3.6% | 
| Median | 2.4% | 2.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 0.68% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.4% | 
Similar Demographics by Self-Care Disability
Demographics Similar to Poles by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from South America (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Russian (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability | 
| Immigrants | North America | 90.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Morocco | 90.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 2.4% | 
| Hmong | 89.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Colombians | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 89.3 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 89.0 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Poles | 88.9 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | South America | 88.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 88.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Russians | 88.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Laotians | 87.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| South American Indians | 87.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Austrians | 87.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 86.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (2.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Irish (2.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Sioux (2.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Slavic (2.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability | 
| Ghanaians | 40.4 /100 | #181 | Average 2.5% | 
| Maltese | 37.5 /100 | #182 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Salvadorans | 36.4 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Yugoslavians | 36.1 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Slavs | 34.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 33.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Irish | 28.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 28.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 28.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Sioux | 24.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Moroccans | 22.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Soviet Union | 22.2 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Ukrainians | 21.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.5% | 
| Immigrants | Germany | 17.9 /100 | #194 | Poor 2.5% | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 15.6 /100 | #195 | Poor 2.5% |