Chilean vs Immigrants from Malaysia Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
 Immigrants from Malaysia
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Malaysia
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
79.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Malaysia Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,654,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,973,854 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 0.61%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Malaysia | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 3.5% | 
| Maximum | 22.9% | 33.4% | 
| Range | 21.3% | 29.9% | 
| Mean | 14.9% | 16.4% | 
| Median | 15.4% | 15.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 13.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 18.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Malaysia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are French (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Aleut (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Carpatho Rusyn (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), British (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Brazil (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (17.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137  | Exceptional 17.0%  | 
| Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138  | Exceptional 17.0%  | 
| French | 90.0 /100 | #139  | Excellent 17.0%  | 
| Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140  | Excellent 17.0%  | 
| Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141  | Excellent 17.0%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 89.6 /100 | #142  | Excellent 17.0%  | 
| British | 89.3 /100 | #143  | Excellent 17.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.3 /100 | #144  | Excellent 17.0%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.7 /100 | #145  | Excellent 17.0%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 88.0 /100 | #146  | Excellent 17.0%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153  | Excellent 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156  | Good 17.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157  | Good 17.1%  |