Burmese vs Immigrants from Australia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Australia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Australia
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Australia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,976 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 23.5% | 15.9% |
| Range | 22.5% | 14.9% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 6.8% |
| Median | 4.7% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Australia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.80%), Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |