Moroccan vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Moroccan
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Moroccans
Czechoslovakians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
35.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,770,808 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 7.0% | 39.0% |
| Range | 6.9% | 38.5% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 4.3% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.77% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Native Hawaiian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
| Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
| Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |