Moroccan vs South American Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Moroccan
South American Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Moroccans
South American Indians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
35.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs South American Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,770,808 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,973 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.15% | 0.64% |
| Maximum | 7.0% | 7.1% |
| Range | 6.9% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.77% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and South American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Native Hawaiian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |