Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Czechoslovakians
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,673,747 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.13% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 3.0% | 39.0% |
| Range | 2.9% | 38.5% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 4.3% |
| Median | 1.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.55% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.54% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Asian (1.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Bolivian (1.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Turkish (1.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Pakistan (1.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |