Moroccan vs Immigrants from Africa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Moroccan
Immigrants from Africa
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Moroccans
Immigrants from Africa
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
35.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Immigrants from Africa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,770,808 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,780,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Immigrants from Africa |
Minimum | 0.15% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 7.0% | 4.2% |
Range | 6.9% | 4.0% |
Mean | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.77% | 0.50% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.70% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.70% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Immigrants from Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), South American Indian (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |