Peruvian vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Peruvian
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Peruvians
Czechoslovakians
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Peruvian vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,040,425 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 6.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Peruvian | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.11% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 4.4% | 39.0% |
| Range | 4.3% | 38.5% |
| Mean | 2.0% | 4.3% |
| Median | 1.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.56% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.75% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.74% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Peruvians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Immigrants from Armenia (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Chilean (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Korean (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Danish (2.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |