Immigrants from Brazil vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Czechoslovakian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Czechoslovakians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Czechoslovakian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,850,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,413,881 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.93%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.36% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 13.2% | 39.0% |
| Range | 12.9% | 38.5% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 4.3% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.94% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Czechoslovakians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Nigeria (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), German (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |