Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Turkey Vision Disability
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Immigrants from Turkey
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Taiwanese
Immigrants from Turkey
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Turkey Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,721,885 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,977,745 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Taiwanese | Immigrants from Turkey |
Minimum | 0.15% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 4.0% | 27.1% |
Range | 3.9% | 26.1% |
Mean | 1.8% | 3.6% |
Median | 1.9% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.80% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.75% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.74% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Taiwanese and Immigrants from Turkey by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Japan (1.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Australia (1.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Luxembourger (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |