Sri Lankan vs Pima Vision Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Pima
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Pima
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Pima Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,158,739 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,675 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 61.2%.
![Sri Lankan vs Pima Vision Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/vision-disability/sri-lankans-vs-pima-vision-disability-chart.webp)
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Pima |
Minimum | 0.49% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 15.7% | 21.0% |
Range | 15.2% | 20.0% |
Mean | 2.3% | 5.5% |
Median | 2.0% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.48% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Albanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Austria (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Italy (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Estonians | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and Houma (3.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |