Pueblo vs Pima Vision Disability
COMPARE
Pueblo
Pima
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Pueblo
Pima
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Pima Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,045,963 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,675 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 0.030%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pueblo | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 17.5% | 21.0% |
| Range | 17.3% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Median | 4.0% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pueblo and Pima by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), Houma (3.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), Houma (3.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |