Moroccan vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Moroccan
Carpatho Rusyn
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Moroccans
Carpatho Rusyns
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
52.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Carpatho Rusyn Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,789,132 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.94%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Carpatho Rusyn |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 15.0% | 19.6% |
| Range | 12.5% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 7.2% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Carpatho Rusyns by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are European (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |