Latvian vs Australian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Australian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Latvians
Australians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Australian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,536,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,956,744 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.23%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Australian |
Minimum | 0.23% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 10.4% | 6.6% |
Range | 10.1% | 6.2% |
Mean | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Australians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Jordanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Serbia (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Argentinean (2.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Kenyan (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | France | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.3% |
New Zealanders | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Palestinians | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.3% |