Latvian vs Australian 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Latvian
Australian
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Latvians
Australians
56.2%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.7%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Australian 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,663,993 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050 and weighted average of 56.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,999,190 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466 and weighted average of 56.7%, a difference of 0.77%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Australian |
| Minimum | 24.9% | 26.3% |
| Maximum | 92.8% | 94.7% |
| Range | 67.9% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 64.5% | 67.3% |
| Median | 64.1% | 65.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 55.7% | 57.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.4% | 76.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.7% | 18.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Australians by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Cambodia (56.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Armenian (56.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Salvadoran (56.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Cuban (56.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Asia (56.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are New Zealander (56.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Tsimshian (56.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (56.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Estonian (56.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Sioux | 93.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 56.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 86.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Cubans | 84.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Salvadorans | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Armenians | 84.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Latvians | 83.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 56.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 83.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 56.2% |