Latvian vs Paraguayan Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Paraguayan
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Latvians
Paraguayans
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Paraguayan Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,536,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,092,282 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Paraguayan |
Minimum | 0.23% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 10.4% | 4.6% |
Range | 10.1% | 4.2% |
Mean | 2.8% | 2.0% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 0.88% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 0.87% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Paraguayans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Czech (2.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Norwegian (2.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |