Kiowa vs Turkish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Kiowa
 Turkish
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Kiowa
Turks
8.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Turkish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,098,289 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,801,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 57.1%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Turkish | 
| Minimum | 5.0% | 0.92% | 
| Maximum | 24.2% | 11.5% | 
| Range | 19.2% | 10.6% | 
| Mean | 12.0% | 5.7% | 
| Median | 11.4% | 5.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 4.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 6.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 2.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.1% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 8.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 8.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 8.7%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 8.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 8.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 9.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 9.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Turks by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 5.5%  |