Jordanian vs Lithuanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Lithuanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Lithuanians
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Lithuanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,412,494 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,829,236 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 7.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 47.1% |
| Range | 6.8% | 46.7% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 9.0% |
| Median | 5.3% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Taiwanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |