Jordanian vs Taiwanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Taiwanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Taiwanese
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Taiwanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,412,494 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,722,995 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 0.090%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Taiwanese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 13.3% |
| Range | 6.8% | 11.0% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 5.7% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Taiwanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Inupiat (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Inupiat (5.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |