Irish vs Scottish Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Irish
 Scottish
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Irish
Scottish
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Scottish Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,428,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,987,666 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.73%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | Scottish | 
| Minimum | 2.2% | 2.1% | 
| Maximum | 48.1% | 50.0% | 
| Range | 45.9% | 47.9% | 
| Mean | 17.7% | 18.2% | 
| Median | 15.8% | 16.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 13.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 20.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 7.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 9.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 9.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Irish and Scottish by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Immigrants from Asia (16.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (16.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Palestinian (16.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Northern European (16.8%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Inupiat (16.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Irish | 98.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Paraguayans | 98.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Palestinians | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Northern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Canadians | 97.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% | 
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% | 
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% | 
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% | 
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% | 
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |