Immigrants from China vs Scottish Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Scottish
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Scottish
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Scottish Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,042,790 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,987,666 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.020%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Scottish |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 50.0% |
| Range | 29.4% | 47.9% |
| Mean | 16.0% | 18.2% |
| Median | 16.3% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Scottish by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Scandinavian (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Scandinavian (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |