Norwegian vs Immigrants from Poland Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Poland
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Poland
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Poland Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,951,359 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,808,570 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.61%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Poland |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 18.9% | 17.5% |
| Range | 17.7% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 6.5% |
| Median | 6.1% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Poland by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |