South American Indian vs Immigrants from Poland Ambulatory Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,869 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,808,570 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.21%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	South American Indian	Immigrants from Poland
Minimum	1.7%	2.8%
Maximum	15.9%	17.5%
Range	14.2%	14.7%
Mean	6.5%	6.5%
Median	5.7%	5.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.8%	5.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.5%	6.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.7%	1.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	3.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.9%	3.0%

Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Immigrants from Poland by Ambulatory Disability

In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.49%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Ambulatory Disability
New Zealanders	97.6 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	97.4 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Morocco	97.3 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.8%
Uruguayans	97.2 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.8%
Colombians	97.2 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	97.1 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.8%
Immigrants \| Colombia	96.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.8%
Danes	96.6 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.8%
South Africans	96.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	95.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Poland	95.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.9%
South American Indians	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Africa	94.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	93.6 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 5.9%
Russians	93.4 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 5.9%
Norwegians	93.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 5.9%
Estonians	92.9 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 5.9%
Costa Ricans	92.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 5.9%
Icelanders	92.6 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Russia	92.4 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 5.9%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 5.9%