Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwean Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Zimbabwean
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Zimbabweans
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwean Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,673,747 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,201,681 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 4.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.13% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 3.0% | 6.8% |
| Range | 2.9% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 2.1% |
| Median | 1.7% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.55% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.54% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Zimbabweans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Asian (1.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Turkish (1.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Pakistan (1.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Australia (1.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |