Immigrants from Spain vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
 Zimbabwean
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Zimbabweans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,646,131 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Zimbabwean | 
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.53% | 
| Maximum | 25.6% | 6.9% | 
| Range | 25.3% | 6.4% | 
| Mean | 4.9% | 3.0% | 
| Median | 2.9% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 3.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Zimbabweans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Burmese (2.8%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Cambodian (2.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119  | Excellent 2.8%  |