Chippewa vs Norwegian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Norwegian
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Norwegians
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Norwegian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,951,359 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 19.7%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Norwegian | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.3% | 
| Maximum | 20.9% | 18.9% | 
| Range | 18.9% | 17.7% | 
| Mean | 9.1% | 6.8% | 
| Median | 8.6% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 7.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 1.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.6% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 7.1%  | 
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 5.9%  | 
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126  | Exceptional 5.9%  |