Immigrants from Italy vs Norwegian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Norwegian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Norwegians
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Norwegian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,167,823 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,951,359 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.65% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 18.9% |
| Range | 13.4% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Norwegians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |