Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Danish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Danish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Danes
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Danish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,441,857 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,952,893 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.40%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Danish |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 22.2% | 51.6% |
| Range | 21.2% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 7.5% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Danes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |