Immigrants from Norway vs Danish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Danish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Danes
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Danish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,699,496 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,952,893 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Danish |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 51.6% |
| Range | 30.7% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 8.2% | 7.5% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Danes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |