South American Indian vs Ugandan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Ugandan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Ugandans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Ugandan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,015,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.29%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 0.098% | 0.45% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 9.4% |
| Range | 16.2% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 3.5% |
| Median | 4.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Ugandans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |