Immigrants from Oceania vs Iroquois Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Iroquois
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Iroquois
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Iroquois Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,272,935 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 15.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.6% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 40.9% |
Range | 18.6% | 37.9% |
Mean | 8.5% | 12.5% |
Median | 7.1% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Chippewa (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Micronesia (7.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |