Immigrants from Central America vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Swiss
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Swiss
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,120,353 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,822,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Swiss |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 26.4% | 26.5% |
| Range | 25.2% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 7.5% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America and Swiss by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and European (6.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |