Immigrants from Belarus vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
 Swiss
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Swiss
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,822,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Swiss | 
| Minimum | 0.54% | 0.81% | 
| Maximum | 19.6% | 26.5% | 
| Range | 19.0% | 25.7% | 
| Mean | 6.2% | 7.5% | 
| Median | 5.9% | 6.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 4.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Swiss by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Lebanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181  | Average 6.1%  |