Immigrants from Syria vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Syria
Costa Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Syria
Costa Ricans
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Syria vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,106,838 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Syria | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 18.7% |
Range | 12.1% | 16.8% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.3% |
Median | 6.0% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Syria and Costa Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |