Immigrants from Uruguay vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Costa Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Costa Ricans
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,255,356 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.78%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 18.7% |
| Range | 9.2% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| Median | 6.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Costa Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |