Immigrants from Jordan vs White/Caucasian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
White/Caucasian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Whites/Caucasians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs White/Caucasian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,250,050 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 27.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 5.7% |
| Range | 6.3% | 3.6% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.99% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.98% | 0.77% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |